John Gebhardt on House Republican Task Force Meeting



Thanks for your information about previous House Republican Task Force meeting you attended last August. I did attend the meeting as the JWCCAA Legislative Chair - our JWCCAA President was unable to attend so she asked me to represent the Chapter as the Legislative Chair . Here is my summary of the meeting along with the letter I left with Rep. Tracy and Sen. Sullivan. It was sturctured different from the meeting you had. There was a lot of interaction with the audience and with both parties there a lot of finger pointing. It became what I would term a very "democratic" meeting with all side being heard. I enjoyed the give and take.

Let me know what you think after you read my comments.

John Gebhardt

RE: Attendance at the House Republican Pension Task Force Meeting in Mt. Sterling 07/24/2006

Date: July 25, 2006

I attended the House Republican Pension Task Force hosted by Rep. Jill Tracy at the AFSCME Local 3567 Hall in Mt. Sterling on Monday, July 24th from 6-8 p.m.. In attendance were Republican Representatives Bill Mitchell, Rich Meyers, and Jill Tracy, and Democratic Senator John Sullivan (Rep. Tracy had invited Sen. Sullivan to the meeting). There was an audience of about 25 people with people representing the prison guard’s union AFSCME Local 3567, the Vets Home employees, and teachers. Rep. Jill Tracy opened the meeting with remarks that this meeting was designed to get public input to seek solutions to the problems of pension funding. She also is planning similar meetings on the Road Tax and Medicare Funding.

The format of the meeting was: first each Representative and Senator Sullivan made opening remarks. Then Matt Habrocker from the Republican Legislative Research Staff presented a Power Point presentation showing the history (as viewed by the Republicans) of the lack of pension funding. Then Rep. Mitchell threw out a lot of facts and figures at which time Sen. Sullivan did the same to try to balance what Rep. Mitchell presented. Most of the information was presented so quickly that I was unable to get it down accurately. Rep. Mitchell said we all would be sent the information presented in the Power Point.

At various points during the two hours there were a lot of verbal exchanges between the Republicans and Sen. Sullivan as to what was spent and funded. Rep. Tracy and audience members tried to cut off the verbal exchanges whenever the discussions got into one party blaming the other for the problems we now face. The format for the evening was basically questions and statements from the audience to the Representatives and Senator Sullivan.

In summary, I believe the Representatives and Sen. Sullivan began to realize the audience was tired of hearing partisan politics and they wanted the members to begin to work more on a “bipartisan” level to solve the problems with pension funding, the staffing shortages of the prisons, the lack of funding to education, and shortage of staff at the veterans homes. A theme that surfaced from the meeting seemed to “priorities and revenue”. Republicans representatives were pushing for an established set of priorities as to what needs to be funded and all felt there is a need to find new sources of revenue as there is not enough coming into pay the bills. I sensed from the audience that they would not be opposed to an increase in income tax “as long as it was dedicated to funding the shortfalls that currently exist vs. spending for new programs”.

On the issue of getting more for “downstate”, Sen. Sullivan said he was recently appointed as Chairman of “downstate” Democrats. Rep. Meyers said five years ago, they use to have a bipartisan meeting of “downstate” representatives and he would look into trying to get that going again. Both agreed that “downstate” Representatives and Democrats needed to work together if they are to get anything downstate because of the Chicago influence. Sen. Sullivan said 60% of the people of Illinois live within a 75 mile radius of Chicago.

There was mention of an A+ Coalition being formed to try to get people to work together to solve the current funding problems. The AFSCME union representative passed around a sign up sheet for members in the audience to join the coalition. Since I was totally unaware of what this group is or what they are proposing, I did not sign the sheet.

The question came up about GASB 45 and I was surprised to learn that “none” of the Representatives or Senator Sullivan was informed about what it was and what implications it would have on pension funding, but they would all look into it.

When asked about selling off state assests, like Illinois highway tollways, to raise revenues, everyone present stated they were not in favor of doing so as it would be a short term solution to a long term problem. Also, if the state is making money with an assest, why sell it off for someone else to make the money. Rep. Meyers said he was basically not in favor of selling off assests, but as a member of House committee that will be looking into this area he wants to see the facts and figures before he makes a final decision.

After the meeting I gave both Rep. Tracy and Sen. Sullivan the following statement as the “Legislative Chair of the JWCCAA Chapter of SUAA. This statement was approved by JWCCAA President Susan Deege who appointed me JWCCAA Legislative Chair, so I could represent JWCCAA at this meeting.

Respectively submitted,

John Gebhardt/JWCCAA Legislative Chair

Explore posts in the same categories: Uncategorized

2 Comments on “John Gebhardt on House Republican Task Force Meeting”

  1. Frank Goudy Says:

    Sound like an interesting meeting.

    I would like to comment upon proposals to increase the state income tax such as A+ or others.

    From FY 1990 to FY 2006 state genderal revenue funds increased form $12.4 billion to $27.0 billion. This is a 117% increase while the CPI increased by only 56% during this same time frame. Even allowing for a reasonable state growth this increase is excessive.

    There have been cutbacks in state agencies, K-12 growth is limited and public universites are being strangled while the pension fund is always underfunded.

    I do not believe that any reasonable intelligent person believe that giving elected officials more money will negate any of those problems. The money will be sucked and spent for various political purposes.

  2. naisioxerloro Says:

    Hi.
    Good design, who make it?


Comment: